characters ´ PDF, DOC, TXT or eBook ✓ A.C. GraylingInteresting were two later sections on Indian and Chinese philosophy which though they were presented as rather primitive and Grayling emphasizes his non expert status with regards to them are able to put a thought provoking spin on ideas that resemble those of the west through subtle differences in vocabularyHowever though I suppose that such a thing is inevitable in this kind of work the thought of some mayor philosophers I am thinking of Leibniz Spinoza Schopenhauer and Peirce in particular really was not represented accurately or completely in this text and the discription of them ventured into caricature at times This shortcoming seems to be connected to Grayling s True Stories Of New England Captives Carried To Canada During The Old Fr frankly uite boring conception of what philosophy actually means and what kind of uestions are properly part of its domain He actually writes at one point that his conception of philosophy is largely determined by the practice of philosophy departments I paraphrase that is to say by a general gest of the expertolk opinion of academic philosophersLast but not least though the book actually has a lot to offer than expected in terms of recent developments in philosophy which it is always risky to include in any history I would have liked it very much if many of the interesting relatively new domains in analytic philosophy especially subdomains of non classical logics epistemology and the philosophy of science would have been given as prominent a place as other almost contemporary schools have such as deconstructivism and A Civic Biology feminismAll in all an interesting read with some very much worthwile anecdotes Good as an introduction to the subject I think though the length of the book will likely put off the true novice This book is a phenomenal introductionor someone with little or no knowledge of philosophy I listened to the audiobook but will order the physical copy to have as a reference that s how well organized and detailed this work is Dr Grayling has broken the book into historical periods and covers one philosopher at a time giving background on each s life Cardiopulmonary Anatomy Physiology focusing on their ideas by highlighting them in discussions of their works And he goes into uite some depth even re representing the arguments in his own words and inserting conclusions of his own here and there to allow the reader to connect thelow of ideas across history While there is very much depth Dr Grayling s writing style keeps the book
very accessible and engaging narrator of the audiobook Neil Gardner isaccessible and engaging The narrator of the audiobook Neil is a pleasure to listen to He is British and he sounds so Alta Tensi N Los Cortocircuitos Del Rock Peruano funny in a charming way when he speaks in an American accent to uote American philosophers. Esthetics logic the philosophy of mind the philosophy of language political philosophy and the history of debates in these areas of enuiry through the ideas of the celebrated philosophers as well as less well known influential thinkers He also asks what we have learntrom this body of thought and what progress is still to be madeThe irst authoritative and accessible single volume history of philosophy or decades remarkable or its range and clarity this is a landmark wor.
"Descartes Influenced Philosophy And Mathematics And Newton "influenced philosophy and mathematics and Newton science and Locke impacted social and political thinking Grayling argues that Spinoza had a greater and general influence because of the impact of his ideas on the Enlightenment Comparably sweeping comments are made about Avicenna six centuries earlier than Spinoza The God of Avicenna is very close to the abstract non personal thought thinking about itself God of Aristotle This conception #OF GOD PROMPTS TWO ASSOCIATED THOUGHTS #God prompts two associated thoughts is of Spinoza and the other is that if references to a deity in Avicenna s account were replaced by references to the natural universe it is hard to see what difference it would make Grayling goes on to say that Avicenna s thought had a large influence on both Arabic and Western thought particularly on Thomas AuinasGrayling makes the point that he avoids discussing philosophy that verges on theology He avoids discussing religion just as he avoids discussing science as such This leads to a somewhat limited discussion of the middle ages and also of contemporary philosophers
such as Karl Jaspers or Alfred North Whitehead or Charles Hartshorne While he gives sympatheticas Karl Jaspers or Alfred North Whitehead or Charles Hartshorne While he gives sympathetic to philosophers who have an abstract conception of God he seems to edit out other conceptions Whether one likes a particular concept or not it seems inappropriate to ban certain tools rom the philosopher s toolboxGrayling s discussion of contemporary philosophers is excellent and brings me up to date in the twenty The Money That Never Was first century on both Anglophone and Continental philosophy His discussion of Indian philosophy seems to me somewhat sketchy describing the interplay of schools without engaging any interesting problems His discussion of Chinese philosophy is better with a good account of thelow A Fair Mystery from Confucius to Mencius to Daoism All in all Grayling s book is thought provoking and entertaining and I am likely to reread large parts of it It is certainly worthwile to plow through a history of philosophy or science every once in a while It helps to put things into context to relativize the often uite considerable egos of these creative solitary writers This one by Grayling is certainly a lot ofun And long 28 hours on audible It is well written stylistically and manages to convey something of the depth breadth and variety of the philosophical tradition Unexpectedly. E of the Buddha Confucius and Socrates through Christianity's dominance of the European mind to the Renaissance and Enlightenment and on to Mill Nietzsche Sartre and philosophy today And since the story of philosophy is incomplete without mention of the great philosophical traditions of India China and the Persian Arabic world he gives a comparative survey of them tooIntelligible The Pond for students and eye openingor philosophy readers he covers epistemology metaphysics ethics I ll admit the history of philosophy is one of my avorite genres having read the works of Bertrand Russell Will Durant Anthony Kenny Bryan Magee Nigel Warburton and others Each has its pros and cons so it s hard to rank them but if I had to Russell s The History of Western Philosophy and Magee s Confessions of a Philosopher would top the list A Little History of Philosophy by Nigel Warburton would come in a close third or those looking or a uicker readBut a close third or those looking or a uicker readBut if I had to recommend one book to someone interested in the subject it would be A C Grayling s latest The History of Philosophy and here s whyFor a single volume work this book has the most
Extensive Coverage Not Only Because Of Its Higher Page Countcoverage not only because of its higher page count also because it packs the most content into each page Grayling states in the in Very good Grayling definitely has a point of view Analytic Continental against religion devotes 518 pages to Western philosophy and 80 pages to Chinese Indian Arabic Persian African philosophy combined but it doesn t really affect the uality of the writing His put down of Continental philosophy is however amazingThe main reason that so little attention is paid to Continental philosophy by Analytic philosophers has to be rankly acknowledged It is that the latter are impatient with at best at worst contemptuous of and here I will illustrate the point what they see as the abuses and confusions of language which in its unexplained neologising its deliberate ambiguity and its overloading attenuating or deflating of meanings the use of the virgule is a common device as above a Fifty Years In Constantinople And Recollections Of Robert College form of phallusy seems impressionistic and slippery the unclarity a maskor unclarity of thought or worse a pretence of profundity When I spotted Grayling s History of Philosophy on the new acuisitions shelf of my library I thought back The Elements Of In Between fifty years ago to reading Bertrand Russell s History of Western Philosophy Russell s book was one man s opinionated take on the whole gamut of philosophy and Grayling s book is much the same One major difference is that seventyive years have elapsed so that Grayling s book contains developments that I wish I had known about when I was in graduate school Another major difference is that western philosophy has evolved in a multicultural direction so that Grayling s book contains sections on Indian Chinese and
ARABIC PERSIAN PHILOSOPHY AS WELL ASPersian philosophy as well as parts on African and eminist philosophyIt s wonderful to get a review of material with which I have had some acuaintance For example though I have an idea what each of the pre Socratic Greek philosophers thought Grayling supplies biographical mate. The story of philosophy is an epic tale an exploration of the ideas views and teachings of some of the most creative minds known to humanity But since the long popular classic Bertrand Russell's History of Western Philosophy Quick Action first published in 1945 there has been no comprehensive and entertaining single volume history of this great intellectual journeyWith his characteristic clarity and elegance A C Grayling takes the readerrom the world views and moralities before the ag.